Safeguarding the Seas
Stopping the pollution of our oceans by ships and fast ferries and preventing deadly collisions with whales

Ship Pollution Accelerates Even With Cleaner Fuels
Read our new submissions to the IMO on air pollution standards for ships: 
  • New ship pollution numbers show growth will outpace benefits of cleaner fuels
  • Dr. James Corbett’s new air pollution estimates are the most accurate yet
  • Friends of the Earth advocates for cleaner marine fuels and ship engines
  • Radically cleaner marine fuels debated during Norway ship pollution talks

    Cruise ships docking in Oslo, Norway, spew black smoke into the air every day. They also foul the air in the pristine fjords that were recently designated World Heritage sites. View more photos at the Friends of the Earth Norway website
    Ships transiting the world’s oceans would abandon dirty bunker fuel and switch to less polluting types of marine diesel within five to 10 years under separate proposals made by green groups and oil tanker lobbyists during a special session of the International Maritime Organization in Norway, November 13 to 17, 2006. Making the switch to cleaner fuels would drastically cut air pollution from ships that causes acid rain and emits harmful particles that can lodge in people’s lungs.

    Bluewater Network under Friends of the Earth International proposed a global sulfur cap on marine fuels at 1.5 percent sulfur (compared to today’s 4.5 percent) and a ceiling of .5 percent sulfur in Sulfur Emissions Control Areas (SECAs) (now at 1.5 percent) beginning in 2010.

    For the first time, a shipping industry group offered a complementary proposal. Intertanko, the organization that represents independent oil tankers, surprised environmentalists as well as shipping and oil interests by proposing that all ocean-going ships switch to marine distillate fuels of 1 percent or less sulfur by 2010; and to .5 percent by 2015. The concept was supported by US, Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands.

    Greece and several oil and shipping organizations balked at the radical proposal – mainly due to objections over cost. Companies such as BP and Shell want to be able to keep selling dirty, cheap residual fuel to shippers – as well as a new line of on-board scrubbers to clean the exhaust once new standards take effect.

    Ultimately,  a sea change in shipping operations is on the horizon: switching fuels remained one of the leading options for reducing ship smokestack pollution to be taken up at the next round of negotiations in April 2007 in London.

    Other marine fuels approaches that were discussed:

    1. Status quo (no change)
    2. Reducing sulfur levels in SECAs only
    3. Residual fuel sulfur caps without a requirement for marine distillate

    Bluewater Network is working with other U. S. and European green groups to ensure that cleaner international fuels standard for ships are adopted. To learn more, see the following:

    IMO Press Release

    Friends of the Earth International proposal

    Intertanko proposal

    Read more about the negotiations

    Ship Pollution Across the Ocean

    Large ocean-going vessels – cargo and container ships, cruise ships, and oil tankers – are one of the fastest growing, least-regulated sources of air pollution in the United States. As more consumer goods are imported from Asia, cargo shipping is expected to double or even triple by 2020 – especially in high-traffic ports such as Oakland, Los Angeles and New York/New Jersey. Cruise ship passenger capacity has doubled in 20 years and continues to expand rapidly. As marine traffic increases, so does the threat to our oceans, marine life, and public health.
    Click here to learn more.


    Read the Latest News

    Check out Port Watch, the new blog by Teri Shore, Bluewater Network's Clean Vessels campaign director.

    Friends of the Earth and EarthJustice may sue the US EPA for failing to meet the April 27th deadline for regulating ship emissions.

    California Senators co-sponsor bill to slash ship smokestack pollution- cleaner ship fuels and engines would be required on all ships calling on U.S. Ports.

    Victory for curbing ship emmissions.

    Bluewater Network, along with other Groups, Call for Big Cuts in Shipping Industry Air Pollution.

    Bluewater Network Urges California to Act Quickly to Reduce Port Emissions.

    Bluewater Network urges IMO to strengthen international air pollution standards and to set standards for shoreside power for ships:

    • Read the two new papers submitted through Friends of the Earth International for meetings in March and April 2006: Shoreside Power and Air Pollution

    Ships Required to Use Cleaner Fuels In California Waters:

    Greening California's Seaports, Living on Earth, National Public Radio, January 6, 2006

    Ship Emissions: 'We Need to Turn a Corner', fuelsustainability.com, January 3, 2006

    California Governor Signs Ship Dumping and Trash Burning Ban

    Environmental groups hail IMO's Annex VI revision promise, Bunkerworld, September 2005

    New calls to control ship exhaust emissions, Numast Telegraph, September, 2005

    Bluewater' letter urging the ratification of an international treaty on preventing air pollution from ships

    Ship Air Pollution and Environmental Justice submissions by Bluewater Network and Friends of the Earth International to the International Maritime Organization, July 2005

    Protesters Target Marine Pollution, Lloyd's List, July 19, 2005

    Port Community Bill of Rights submitted to the International Maritime Organization

    Fact Sheet on why the U.S. should ratify Annex VI

    California Assembly Joint Resolution 8 calling for Annex VI Ratification co-sponsored by Bluewater Network

    California bill SB 771 would ban ship dumping and on-board incineration. Read the Press Release and Fact Sheet.

    Comments to the California Air Resources Board on shipping and ports:
    1. Shoreside power for ships
    2. Harborcraft engines and fuels
    3. Ship auxiliary engines
    4. Ports and goods movement

    EPA Lawsuit Decision Allows Shipping Pollution to Grow

    Shipping Air Pollution Treaty Sets Global Standards

    Bluewater Network provides environmental perspective at Air and Waste Management Association conference on marine emissions in Seattle, April 2004. Click to view powerpoint presentation.

    Where There's Smoke, There's Pollution -- an op-ed by Bluewater Network's Russell Long in The New York Times

    Study Shows Greater Ship Emissions (November 12, 2003)

    Conservationists Sue EPA Again Seeking Real Regulation of Air Pollution Spewed by Sea-Going Vessels

    Bush Administration Backslides on Final Regulation for Sea-Going Vessel Air Pollution

    Bush Administration issues "toothless" regulations for sea going vessels

    Shipping Air Pollution Fact Sheet

    Petition to the International Maritime Organization: letter signed by 29 groups urging the agency to begin regulating greenhouse gas emissions from ships

    A Stacked Deck: report detailing the tremendous air pollution pumped out of the big ships

    Read Bluewater Network's comments to the EPA on the ship emissions rulemaking.

    back to top

    Read our Growing List of Victories:

    2005
    Bluewater Network’s advocacy was key to the passage of the new regulation that directs ships to switch to cleaner fuels once within 24 nautical miles of the coast. We gained support from the California Senate, San Francisco Board of Supervisors, Port of San Francisco and a coalition of environmental and public health organizations.

    Provided an environmental perspective for cleaning up ship smokestack pollution at an international marine fuels industry conference called Bunkerworld in San Francisco in October 2005 as a panelist and featured speaker.

    Exposed the International Maritime Organization’s poor environmental record and shipping industry bias during a protest at its headquarters in London. Helped convince shipping nations to consider stronger air pollution standards. Collaborated with environmental justice activists to urge shipping nations adopt a Port Community Bill of Rights.

    Partnered with the Port of San Francisco to achieve US EPA funding of clean fuels incentive program and in developing an environmental recognition plan for cruise lines calling on San Francisco Bay.

    Co-sponsored with the shipping industry a California state resolution to ratify the international shipping pollution treaty, Annex VI of MARPOL.

    Port of Seattle installs shoreside power for cruise ships at Pier 30 in an effort to reduce air pollution and comply with air quality mandates.

    2004
    Advocated for stronger air and global warming standards for ships at the IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee meeting in London.

    Second lawsuit against US EPA results in a new rulemaking process for large ship emissions slated for 2007.

    Published editorial in The New York Times that revealed that a single ship entering harbor produces emissions equal to 350,000 cars in one hour.

    2003
    US EPA issues first-ever air emission regulations for ocean-going vessels. However, the rules provide little protection as foreign fleets which comprise the bulk of port traffic are excluded. Bluewater Network files second lawsuit against the agency to include the foreign fleet and require best available technology.

    Exposed the Port of Seattle’s failure to implement a clean fuels standard that was a requirement for operating a new cruise terminal, forcing the port to expedite implementation of equivalent air quality measures before the new cruise season.

    2002
    Bluewater Network mobilized clean air activists to testify at EPA’s public hearing on proposed new air pollution standards for big ships. We also submitted extensive comments on the weak rules that generated numerous sign-on from allied groups. Major media outlets covered the story about the “sham regulations.”

    2001
    Through legal action, Bluewater Network forces the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to initiate new regulations to initiate new regulations to reduce the tremendous levels of smog, airborne particles, and toxics emitted by container ships, oil tankers, and cruise ships.

    Bluewater Network organizes an international shipping emissions conference in San Francisco in collaboration with industry and regulators.

    back to top

    Get Answers to Some Frequently Asked Questions:

    What can be done to reduce shipping pollution?

    back to top

    Visit These Related Websites:

    West Coast Diesel Emissions Reduction Collaborative: The West Coast Collaborative is a public-private partnership working to reduce diesel emissions along the West Coast.

    International Maritime Organization: the United Nation's specialized agency responsible for maritime safety and preventing pollution from ships

    California Air Resources Board Commercial Marine Vessels: Contains many presentations about ship pollution rulemaking, emissions, fuels and shoreside power made at working group meetings.

    2001 Conference on Marine Vessels and Air Quality: Presentations: information from the conference sponsored by the Environmental Protection Agency

    California Ballast Water Regulations: information on regulations recently enacted to regulate ballast water

    Shipboard Pollution Control: report published by the US Navy on reducing solid waste from ships

     


    Did you know that pollution from ships may account for half the sulfur emissions found over the world's oceans? Read our report "A Stacked Deck" for more information.

    Web Stats - Free Realtime Web Statistics Tracker & Counter